You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

Connected Learning Alliance Logo
  • About Connected Learning
  • Who we are
  • Resources
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Get Connected
October 21, 2013

Human Rights and Social Media in India: Blank Noise

Author

Elizabeth Losh
Categories: Digital Citizenship, Equity
group of teenagers leaning against outside fence in india

On a recent visit to Sarai, a Delhi research think tank housed in the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, I met a number of female university students who described participating in the mass protests that occurred after a 23-year-old physiotherapy student was raped and murdered in what many perceived as an event that unleashed a torrent of dissent to express longstanding dissatisfaction about lax policing and prosecution of crimes against women in India.  Participants recounted assaults at demonstrations that included braving tear gas, water cannons, and violent interruptions by police of the peaceful sharing of experiences among congregants after years of shame and silence.

Many had responded to Facebook invitations or details contained in mass SMS text communications with instructions to converge at protest areas at police headquarters or the symbolic site of national identity, India Gate.  Some also described the role of speeches disseminated on YouTube by activist leaders such as Kavita Krishnam – secretary of the AIPWA (All India Progressive Women’s Association) – or the importance of discourse being shared on blogs such as Kafila.

At Sarai I also met a number of students who described themselves as local volunteers for Blank Noise, an art action group that improvises creative ways for women to reclaim public space and to engage men in dialogue.  Founder Jasmeen Patheja, a TED fellow, agreed to sit down for an interview to discuss how social media galvanized her collaborators long before news coverage of the 2012 rape case transformed sexual violence into a matter for discussion in the mainstream media and large-scale public debate.  Blank Noise was initiated in Bangalore, but it is now active in many different cities; a strong core group is now in Delhi too.

Influenced by feminist artists of the seventies and eighties, particularly the Guerilla Girls, and artists such as Marina Abramovic, Suzanne Lacey, and Sophie Calle, Patheja began with a series of mind mapping exercises around the theme of “public space” and soon discovered that subjects who participated in interviews or focus groups tended to associate a host of negative terms, such as “aggression,” “stare,” “vulnerable,” “groping,” and “feeling sick inwards,” with a concept that should be linked with positive civic participation and cultural interaction.

As part of her final senior project at Srishti School of Art, Design, and Technology, Patheja led a series of workshops over the course of a three-month period with other female artists and began to focus on raising public awareness about how the issue affects many types of women in many situations during many times of the day.  Srishti has a history of research-based arts practice that emphasizes community engagement and participatory culture.  Patheja graduated in 2003, and she has now returned to Srishti as an official Artist in Residence there while she continues work on Blank Noise.

Social media was an important vehicle for her work from the very beginning of her college career as an artist and activist.  Conventional awareness-raising campaigns with public service announcements or billboards were too static and too costly for her low-budget efforts, and she wanted to encourage active participation rather than passive consumption and do substantive research on responses rather than merely blast messages unidirectionally.  As she explained, “social media enables Blank Noise to take the form of an ongoing conversation.  It is shaped and built by testimonials” as well as by “collective definition building via arguments and counter arguments.”lizlosh.400c

Around 2004, Patheja “stumbled upon blogging as means to document and share ideas” and then “realized that conversations were beginning to build right there.”  Initially she began by posting photographs of men on the street, who telegraphed their aggression in body language and mastery of space, but she and the core team of six Blank Noise facilitators worried that a “wall of shame was not what we wanted at all” and that potential dynamics around class entitlement might also be problematic.  In revising the portraits of these men, she made their identities unrecognizable with pixilation and reverse color and refocused her attention on “strategies of engagement and the gamut of public interactions.”  Rather than identify individual men, she wanted to “identify the type and intention of what becomes harassment,” which “threw open questions on flirting, flirt spaces, codes, consent, and class-based issues.”

In 2006 the Blank Noise team organized a blogathon in which bloggers shared their experiences of street harassment.  Spurred by the initiative of volunteer Smita Jain, a “mass catharsis on the web” took place, which filtered into the mainstream press both nationally and internationally.

Although many of Patheja’s projects use web-based technologies of communication, much of her work is very site-specific and grounded in material culture, such as a project in which tables were set up in Bangalore’s “Rapist Lane,” which Blank Noise renamed “Safest Lane” for the occasion and set up tables to foster dialogue in extended one-hour conversations over tea and samosas.  The dialogues were intended to “unlearn biases and fear” and the subject matter covered “anything and everything except street harassment” (See coverage of the event in The Atlantic here).  Murals were also painted on the street with “Idle Giant Action” of larger-than-life women in silhouettes to mark where territory had been reclaimed.  The 2006 Night Action Plan, which included eight testimonials rendered in graffiti on pavement and roads, “were designed to challenge the perception of time, place, and age” with the dynamic between “the identity of survivor and the role of the mute spectator.”

As Patheja completed projects, she found that she needed to find different ways to overcome stigma and people’s aversion even to describing unpleasant interactions with aggressive men as sexual abuse.  Themes began to emerge, which had to do with anxieties about the body and particularly changes in the body.  She argued that “blame, shame, and guilt are at the core of the silence and discomfort around the issue.”  Blank Noise was devoted to “building testimonials, creating vocabulary, and creating a safe space for people to be able to talk about their experiences.”

The art world from Brooklyn to Stuttgart had began to notice the work of Blank Noise to “bring men and women into conversation about street harassment and to question boundaries of what constituted ‘teasing,’ ‘flirting,’  ‘harassment,’ and ‘sexual violence.’”

By using the common Indian euphemism “eve teasing” as a way to identify potentially offensive behavior, Patheja soon found herself with lots of material to process.  Blank Noise created matrices with boxes for different types of behavior and encouraged participants to place thumbprints in the appropriate rectangles to mark behaviors that constituted eve teasing (men used blue; women used red).  Women donated the clothing they were wearing when they felt victimized as a striking form of display media.  The group even made an “eve teasing food chart” with a menu of all of the food-related catcalls that women remembered hearing.

Creating hashtags was an important way to raise awareness, as in the case of the #INeverAskForIt campaign in which women were invited to tweet what they were wearing when they experienced sexual violence.  Blank Noise also organized events in which women sat in the general compartment on different forms of transportation (India is famous for its female-only train cars and bus sections).  In this action, participants were encouraged to use the hashtag #segregationnosolution in their Tweets.  In the future, she hopes to create a mobile game that focuses on transportation segregation.

On Jan. 1 people in 11 cities took the Safe City Pledge.  Participants were encouraged to make “safe city pledges” that emphasized how they could “influence change in their own sphere.”  A number of professions were represented in the campaign from schoolteachers to gynecologists.  Pledges could be eloquently simple, such as “I pledge to walk alone at night.”

On Jan. 19 Blank Noise organized a 24-hour tweetathon with #SafeCityPledge as the focus, which was publicized on the Blank Noise blog and on Facebook.  “We had men and women from across the world curate this on an hourly basis.  Two of our hourly curators were from the USA: Mandy Van Deven and Kolly Kearl.”lizlosh.400b

They have also partnered with Breakthrough (the subject of an earlier DMLcentral post) on #segregationnosolution and then created some live events around collecting pledges and promises from men that combined the Blank Noise #safecitypledge campaign with the Breakthrough #ringthebell effort.

One of the challenges facing equal rights activists in India has to do with a climate of fear about the dangers facing women and how the media news cycle contributes to constraining women’s freedom by perpetuating protectionist ideologies.  According to Patheja, this perpetuates “an environment of blame and warnings” in which “the onus of safety falls on women.  It’s an environment that’s constantly warning you ‘be careful.’”  To dramatize this idea, she created a video in 2003 that appropriated, performed, and remixed coverage of rape in the news during a three-month period.  She also plans to create an online video that adapts her “Step By Step Guide to Unapologetic Walking” as a sequence of multimedia how-to instructions.

Blank Noise volunteers were encouraged to adopt new identities as “Action Heroes” and to reclaim public space by allowing themselves to appear in public idle and relaxed.
lizlosh.29.400aSometimes they were differentiated with arrows to publicize the street action, and sometimes participants in flash mobs performed street action without special demarcation.  As Patheja observed, “Action Heroes make the public space familiar by asserting their presence there. There is a purposeful confrontation of fear, of learning to claim.”  During Blank Noise events, “Action Heroes made eye contact, leaned by the railing, worked towards being unapologetic about their presence and purpose in city spaces.”

Facebook has also been a place where participants could try out new identities as Blank Noise supporters.  Patheja produced a range of speech balloons for pre-existing comic book avatars that people could use as their Facebook profiles to show solidarity, including an active community of men.

When I asked her how she dealt with the transience of political engagement on Facebook, where gestures of political affirmation could be relatively short-lived, she was philosophical.  “I think it is okay to create engagement up to a point.  Every campaign has a life and an afterlife.  The worry is when there’s a belief that a social issue can be addressed entirely through one kind of medium or that Facebook alone is the only way to address an issue.  The campaign could end but the conversations continue and could leave a resonance.  We have to understand, accept, and work with the limitations and possibilities of a medium.  We’ve been using the web for almost ten years now and have built several events over the years.  The conversations are sustained, documented, shared across many web spaces, including Twitter, Facebook, Blogger, and Orkut.”

For those who want to become involved with the Facebook Blank Noise community, the links are here and here.

Image credits: Blank Noise http://blog.blanknoise.org/

Related Posts

March 15, 2023 Mobilizing Teen-Centered Research Findings for Teen-Oriented Storytelling

March 13, 2023 The Power of Participatory Projects: Public Media and Gen Z

March 7, 2023 Call for Proposals Now Open for the Sixth Annual Connected Learning Summit

Categories

  • Civic Engagement
  • Connected Learning
  • Critical Perspectives
  • Digital Citizenship
  • Digital Learning
  • Edtech
  • Educational Practice
  • Equity
  • Featured
  • HX
  • New Trends
  • Research
  • Youth Well-Being

Blog Archive

  • 2023
    • February 2023
    • March 2023
  • 2022
    • January 2022
    • February 2022
    • April 2022
    • May 2022
    • June 2022
    • July 2022
    • August 2022
    • September 2022
    • October 2022
    • November 2022
    • December 2022
  • 2021
    • January 2021
    • February 2021
    • March 2021
    • April 2021
    • May 2021
    • June 2021
    • July 2021
    • August 2021
    • September 2021
    • October 2021
    • November 2021
    • December 2021
  • 2020
    • January 2020
    • February 2020
    • March 2020
    • April 2020
    • May 2020
    • June 2020
    • July 2020
    • August 2020
    • September 2020
    • October 2020
    • November 2020
    • December 2020
  • 2019
    • January 2019
    • February 2019
    • March 2019
    • April 2019
    • May 2019
    • June 2019
    • July 2019
    • August 2019
    • September 2019
    • October 2019
    • November 2019
    • December 2019
  • 2018
    • January 2018
    • February 2018
    • March 2018
    • April 2018
    • May 2018
    • June 2018
    • July 2018
    • August 2018
    • September 2018
    • October 2018
    • November 2018
    • December 2018
  • 2017
    • January 2017
    • February 2017
    • March 2017
    • April 2017
    • May 2017
    • June 2017
    • July 2017
    • August 2017
    • September 2017
    • October 2017
    • November 2017
    • December 2017
  • 2016
    • January 2016
    • February 2016
    • March 2016
    • April 2016
    • May 2016
    • June 2016
    • July 2016
    • August 2016
    • September 2016
    • October 2016
    • November 2016
    • December 2016
  • 2015
    • January 2015
    • February 2015
    • March 2015
    • April 2015
    • May 2015
    • June 2015
    • July 2015
    • August 2015
    • September 2015
    • October 2015
    • November 2015
    • December 2015
  • 2014
    • January 2014
    • February 2014
    • March 2014
    • April 2014
    • May 2014
    • June 2014
    • July 2014
    • August 2014
    • September 2014
    • October 2014
    • November 2014
    • December 2014
  • 2013
    • January 2013
    • February 2013
    • March 2013
    • April 2013
    • May 2013
    • June 2013
    • July 2013
    • August 2013
    • September 2013
    • October 2013
    • November 2013
    • December 2013
  • 2012
    • January 2012
    • February 2012
    • March 2012
    • April 2012
    • May 2012
    • June 2012
    • July 2012
    • August 2012
    • September 2012
    • October 2012
    • November 2012
    • December 2012
  • 2011
    • January 2011
    • February 2011
    • March 2011
    • April 2011
    • May 2011
    • June 2011
    • July 2011
    • August 2011
    • September 2011
    • October 2011
    • November 2011
    • December 2011
  • 2010
    • January 2010
    • February 2010
    • March 2010
    • April 2010
    • May 2010
    • June 2010
    • July 2010
    • August 2010
    • September 2010
    • October 2010
    • November 2010
    • December 2010
  • 2009
    • October 2009
    • November 2009
    • December 2009

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up-to-date with our latest news and information.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Connected Learning in Teaching Practice
  • Connected Learning Research Network
  • Connected Learning in Libraries
  • Connected Educators
  • Connected Courses
  • Connected Civics
  • Institute of Play

  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Work With Us
  • Media
  • Write for Us
  • People
  • Newsletter
  • CLRN
  • CL Summit
  • CL Lab