You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

Connected Learning Alliance Logo
  • About Connected Learning
  • Who we are
  • Resources
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Get Connected
March 25, 2013

In Praise of Peer to Peer Connectivity: Technosociologist Zeynep Tufekci

Author

Howard Rheingold
Category: Digital Citizenship
woman giving presentation at ARS Electronica 2011

Zeynep Tufekci, a sociologist who uses, as well as studies, social media, offers a refreshingly rigorous and empirically-scaffolded perspective amid the frenzy of armchair social science regarding the impact of Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Reddit and other participatory media. Too often, public discourse about the influence of social media, both positive and negative, devolves into a Manichaean rhetoric of utopia-or-apocalypse. While strong points of view from all quarters are necessary when new technologies are debated in the public sphere, Tufekci captured my attention by her combination of empirical scholarship, ability to tackle nuanced explanations in straightforward prose, and willingness to challenge dunderheaded proclamations by more famous commentators.

When The New Yorker’s Malcolm Gladwell based his argument for the trivial role of social media in the Egyptian revolution (“Small Change: Why the Revolution Won’t be Tweeted”) on pop sociology concepts, Tufekci’s blog rebuttal (“What Gladwell Gets Wrong: The Real Problem is Scale Mismatch – Plus Weak and Strong Ties are Complementary and Supportive”) took Gladwell to task for misunderstanding the sociological terms he cited when making his argument:

“Malcolm Gladwell has written an interesting piece in The New Yorker, arguing that real social change occurs when strong, rather than weak-tie networks, organize hierarchically, rather than in a de-centralized network structure. His example contrasts the lunch-counter protests in Greensboro, North Carolina in the sixties with the low-stakes activism through social media. While he makes many valid points, his key argument is misguided:

“I will make two main points in this post. One, the key issue facing activists who wish for real social change is the mismatch between the scale of our problems (global) and the natural scale of our sociality (local). This is a profound problem and more, not less, social media is almost certainly a key element of any solution. Second, the relationship between weak and strong ties is one of complementarity and support, not one of opposition. Gladwell has written about weak and strong ties before and continues a tradition of contrasting them as ontological opposites, somehow opposing and displacing each other. That is a widespread conceptual error and rests upon an inadequate understanding of these concepts. Large pools of weaker ties are crucial to being able to build robust networks of stronger ties – and Internet use is a key to this process.”

Tufekci’s point about the utility of weak ties isn’t novel – she’s reminding us about “The Strength of Weak Ties,” the title and subject of Mark Granovetter’s classic (1973!) paper. Often, critics argue that while social media enable people to maintain larger numbers of superficial relationships, those “weak tie” relationships aren’t as valuable as the more limited number of deeper relationships we have the time to keep up (and discussions about the number of strong tie relationships inevitably bring up Dunbar’s Number of approximately 150). Tufekci notes the often complementary relationship between one’s weak and strong ties, zooms back to focus more effectively on the relationships between online and face to face social networks, and deploys well-understood sociological concepts to tease out the complexities of mediated social change. Tufekci’s advantage over Gladwell is not just her knowledge of what sociological terms really imply, but her direct observation – Tufekci visited Tahrir Square as soon as she was able after the January, 2011 revolution.

In addition to her debate with Gladwell, Tufekci has written other extensive pieces about “#Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood Teaches a Lesson Elections in the Age of Twitter and Google Spreadsheets,” “New Media and People-Powered Enterprises,” and “Occupy the Political: Politics of Self-Expression and the Occupy Movement,” as well as topics outside the realm of civic upheaval, such as “Does Facebook Cause Loneliness? Short answer, No. Why Are We Discussing this? Long Answer Below,” and “Free Speech and Power: From Reddit Creeps to anti-Muslim Videos, It’s not Just ‘Free Speech’.” In our brief video interview, Tufekci speaks directly to our readers’ interest in the relationships between youth, digital media, and civic engagement – you can’t get much more engaged than revolution.

Banner image credit: Ars Electronica http://www.flickr.com/photos/arselectronica/6111832289/

Related Posts

A ripped sign reads in large red capital letters: you are under surveillance

October 25, 2022 Getting Over Privacy: Surveillance Studies and Edtech

August 15, 2022 What Does Well-Being Mean to Children in a Digital Age?

July 6, 2022 Learn, Organize, and Collaborate with Fellow Innovators and Researchers at CLS2022 Workshops & Roundtables

Categories

  • Civic Engagement
  • Connected Learning
  • Critical Perspectives
  • Digital Citizenship
  • Digital Learning
  • Edtech
  • Educational Practice
  • Equity
  • Featured
  • HX
  • New Trends
  • Research
  • Youth Well-Being

Blog Archive

  • 2023
    • 2022
      • January 2022
      • February 2022
      • April 2022
      • May 2022
      • June 2022
      • July 2022
      • August 2022
      • September 2022
      • October 2022
      • November 2022
      • December 2022
    • 2021
      • January 2021
      • February 2021
      • March 2021
      • April 2021
      • May 2021
      • June 2021
      • July 2021
      • August 2021
      • September 2021
      • October 2021
      • November 2021
      • December 2021
    • 2020
      • January 2020
      • February 2020
      • March 2020
      • April 2020
      • May 2020
      • June 2020
      • July 2020
      • August 2020
      • September 2020
      • October 2020
      • November 2020
      • December 2020
    • 2019
      • January 2019
      • February 2019
      • March 2019
      • April 2019
      • May 2019
      • June 2019
      • July 2019
      • August 2019
      • September 2019
      • October 2019
      • November 2019
      • December 2019
    • 2018
      • January 2018
      • February 2018
      • March 2018
      • April 2018
      • May 2018
      • June 2018
      • July 2018
      • August 2018
      • September 2018
      • October 2018
      • November 2018
      • December 2018
    • 2017
      • January 2017
      • February 2017
      • March 2017
      • April 2017
      • May 2017
      • June 2017
      • July 2017
      • August 2017
      • September 2017
      • October 2017
      • November 2017
      • December 2017
    • 2016
      • January 2016
      • February 2016
      • March 2016
      • April 2016
      • May 2016
      • June 2016
      • July 2016
      • August 2016
      • September 2016
      • October 2016
      • November 2016
      • December 2016
    • 2015
      • January 2015
      • February 2015
      • March 2015
      • April 2015
      • May 2015
      • June 2015
      • July 2015
      • August 2015
      • September 2015
      • October 2015
      • November 2015
      • December 2015
    • 2014
      • January 2014
      • February 2014
      • March 2014
      • April 2014
      • May 2014
      • June 2014
      • July 2014
      • August 2014
      • September 2014
      • October 2014
      • November 2014
      • December 2014
    • 2013
      • January 2013
      • February 2013
      • March 2013
      • April 2013
      • May 2013
      • June 2013
      • July 2013
      • August 2013
      • September 2013
      • October 2013
      • November 2013
      • December 2013
    • 2012
      • January 2012
      • February 2012
      • March 2012
      • April 2012
      • May 2012
      • June 2012
      • July 2012
      • August 2012
      • September 2012
      • October 2012
      • November 2012
      • December 2012
    • 2011
      • January 2011
      • February 2011
      • March 2011
      • April 2011
      • May 2011
      • June 2011
      • July 2011
      • August 2011
      • September 2011
      • October 2011
      • November 2011
      • December 2011
    • 2010
      • January 2010
      • February 2010
      • March 2010
      • April 2010
      • May 2010
      • June 2010
      • July 2010
      • August 2010
      • September 2010
      • October 2010
      • November 2010
      • December 2010
    • 2009
      • October 2009
      • November 2009
      • December 2009

    Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up-to-date with our latest news and information.

    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    • Connected Learning in Teaching Practice
    • Connected Learning Research Network
    • Connected Learning in Libraries
    • Connected Educators
    • Connected Courses
    • Connected Civics
    • Institute of Play

    • Contact
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Work With Us
    • Media
    • Write for Us
    • People
    • Newsletter
    • CLRN
    • CL Summit
    • CL Lab