You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

Connected Learning Alliance Logo
  • About Connected Learning
  • Who we are
  • Resources
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Get Connected
March 14, 2013

Re-Designing Learning For Democracy

Author

Cathy Davidson
Categories: Civic Engagement, Connected Learning
john dewey quote democracy must be born anew within each new generation

Ann Pendleton-Jullian, the architect and educational redesigner, notes that:  “Design has the capacity to shape contexts as frames for things to happen.”  My excitement at being part of the connected learning movement and the Digital Media and Learning initiative sponsored by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation is that, together, thousands of us are thinking and working and making in order to design new ecosystems for learning in which the democratic, egalitarian, and innovative can thrive and flourish.

If you think you hear a critique of the status quo in that sentence, you are correct.  I would argue that much of present formal education—in public schools and private schools too—systemically shapes the context for inequality.  The apparatus of end of year standardized testing, in particular, is based on a premise of a uniform, fair standard of judgment for all school kids.  Yet we know that test scores map with little variation onto material wealth.

Our schools, sadly, are structured by the extreme income inequality and lack of mobility that has increasingly characterized U.S. society since the late 1970s, a disparity more unequal in the U.S. than in other developed nations.  Over the last fifty years, the country’s top 1% of earners have gained 275% greater income, while the middle spectrum of earners have gained less than 40% and the bottom five percent have stayed virtually stagnant.

Tragically, instead of formal education now being the way to upward mobility that it once was, it now, if anything, perpetuates inequality.  In 1945, a child had two more years of education than his or her parents.  Now that figure is six months.  Test scores, grades, drop-out rates, admission to college, and college success rates all correlate with income.  Right now our educational reward system is an ecosystem where failure for those already deprived of resources is the almost inevitable outcome.  Where a system of inequality is systematically rewarded, there is no true democracy.

We are judging failing students and failing schools competitively against those whose resources have increased 275%.  When we standardize educational consequences based on outputs but without comparable concern for the inputs, we are measuring income inequality not intelligence, skill, potential, creativity, independent thinking, innovation, or drive—the things we believe to be essential to a democracy.

Our “democratic future” (the theme of our 2013 Digital Media and Learning Conference) requires a system redesign.  Needless to say, renewed public support for all public education funded equally would be the single most significant way to reframe the educational context for meritocracy, not material inheritance.

Since there are few signs that such a revolution is imminent, the connected learning agenda focuses on supporting learning in informal contexts to contribute to the success of kids.  These are enhanced, alternative pathways to learning for all kids.  For those youth who go to under-supported schools, connected learning contributes opportunities that overworked public school teachers simply do not have.

To my mind, four aspects of connected learning serve as “frames” where a more democratic form of learning can happen:

(1) Social learning:  Connected learning helps youth figure out the best ways to use their own talents to gain knowledge and to work with one another to achieve success.  Peer teaching, peer leadership, and peer-to-peer feedback are part of the learning design.  These collaborative, learning-by-doing skills are inherently valuable as life skills that help youth to survive and thrive in school and beyond.

(2) Maker culture and media:  It goes without saying that youth love media and that many schools are not able to provide computers and other devices to kids to help them master the technologies that shape our world.  By focusing on youth’s ability to interact, connect, design, create, and program their own devices, connected learning becomes a foundation upon which other learning—and future careers—can be built.

(3) Passion, interest, and play:  The academic subjects on standardized testing simply do not excite every child.  What does?  Connected learning is rooted in the idea that everyone has something they want to learn about, and finding out what that is key to success in life.  Not every child is interested in the same things but kids are inspired and do better when they are around other interested kids.  They share an ecosystem where the joy and discipline of mastery are reinforced and encouraged.

(4) Badges and new forms of assessment:  If we lived in a utopian, egalitarian world where people seamlessly moved from their interests and skills to a workplace that perfectly matched and rewarded those interests and skills, we would not need quality metrics.  We do not live in such a world.  Instead, standardized testing is the single most consistent apparatus for gatekeeping the status quo, from preschool to professional school.  Instead of blaming teachers for “failing schools,” we should be blaming our unequal society.  As an alternative to fixed, standardized, summative grading of a few core academic subjects, we’ve spent the last twenty months exploring digital badges as an alternative system for identifying and validating skills, accomplishments, quality, and interests that can be earned in many learning environments.  Open badging makes it easy for anyone to issue, earn, or display badges across the web through a shared infrastructure free and open to all.  No fill in the blanks.  No Kaplan cram schools.  No teaching or learning to the test.  Badging is a crucial element in framing a context in which a more democratic, egalitarian outcome is possible.

These are a few dimensions of the connected learning ecosystem designed to promote a more egalitarian and democratic society.  There are literally dozens of other ways to create an ecosystem where learning flourishes for all.  What are yours?  I hope you’ll add them in the “Comments” below, and that your week at the “Democratic Futures” conference will be full of new ideas that will help you shape the context where all our best dreams can happen.

Banner image credit: bryanjack http://www.flickr.com/photos/bryanjack/8449316118/

Related Posts

March 20, 2023 Technology’s Child: Making the Complex More Concrete for Research on Kids and Tech

March 15, 2023 Mobilizing Teen-Centered Research Findings for Teen-Oriented Storytelling

March 13, 2023 The Power of Participatory Projects: Public Media and Gen Z

Categories

  • Civic Engagement
  • Connected Learning
  • Critical Perspectives
  • Digital Citizenship
  • Digital Learning
  • Edtech
  • Educational Practice
  • Equity
  • Featured
  • HX
  • New Trends
  • Research
  • Youth Well-Being

Blog Archive

  • 2023
    • February 2023
    • March 2023
  • 2022
    • January 2022
    • February 2022
    • April 2022
    • May 2022
    • June 2022
    • July 2022
    • August 2022
    • September 2022
    • October 2022
    • November 2022
    • December 2022
  • 2021
    • January 2021
    • February 2021
    • March 2021
    • April 2021
    • May 2021
    • June 2021
    • July 2021
    • August 2021
    • September 2021
    • October 2021
    • November 2021
    • December 2021
  • 2020
    • January 2020
    • February 2020
    • March 2020
    • April 2020
    • May 2020
    • June 2020
    • July 2020
    • August 2020
    • September 2020
    • October 2020
    • November 2020
    • December 2020
  • 2019
    • January 2019
    • February 2019
    • March 2019
    • April 2019
    • May 2019
    • June 2019
    • July 2019
    • August 2019
    • September 2019
    • October 2019
    • November 2019
    • December 2019
  • 2018
    • January 2018
    • February 2018
    • March 2018
    • April 2018
    • May 2018
    • June 2018
    • July 2018
    • August 2018
    • September 2018
    • October 2018
    • November 2018
    • December 2018
  • 2017
    • January 2017
    • February 2017
    • March 2017
    • April 2017
    • May 2017
    • June 2017
    • July 2017
    • August 2017
    • September 2017
    • October 2017
    • November 2017
    • December 2017
  • 2016
    • January 2016
    • February 2016
    • March 2016
    • April 2016
    • May 2016
    • June 2016
    • July 2016
    • August 2016
    • September 2016
    • October 2016
    • November 2016
    • December 2016
  • 2015
    • January 2015
    • February 2015
    • March 2015
    • April 2015
    • May 2015
    • June 2015
    • July 2015
    • August 2015
    • September 2015
    • October 2015
    • November 2015
    • December 2015
  • 2014
    • January 2014
    • February 2014
    • March 2014
    • April 2014
    • May 2014
    • June 2014
    • July 2014
    • August 2014
    • September 2014
    • October 2014
    • November 2014
    • December 2014
  • 2013
    • January 2013
    • February 2013
    • March 2013
    • April 2013
    • May 2013
    • June 2013
    • July 2013
    • August 2013
    • September 2013
    • October 2013
    • November 2013
    • December 2013
  • 2012
    • January 2012
    • February 2012
    • March 2012
    • April 2012
    • May 2012
    • June 2012
    • July 2012
    • August 2012
    • September 2012
    • October 2012
    • November 2012
    • December 2012
  • 2011
    • January 2011
    • February 2011
    • March 2011
    • April 2011
    • May 2011
    • June 2011
    • July 2011
    • August 2011
    • September 2011
    • October 2011
    • November 2011
    • December 2011
  • 2010
    • January 2010
    • February 2010
    • March 2010
    • April 2010
    • May 2010
    • June 2010
    • July 2010
    • August 2010
    • September 2010
    • October 2010
    • November 2010
    • December 2010
  • 2009
    • October 2009
    • November 2009
    • December 2009

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up-to-date with our latest news and information.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Connected Learning in Teaching Practice
  • Connected Learning Research Network
  • Connected Learning in Libraries
  • Connected Educators
  • Connected Courses
  • Connected Civics
  • Institute of Play

  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Work With Us
  • Media
  • Write for Us
  • People
  • Newsletter
  • CLRN
  • CL Summit
  • CL Lab