You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

Connected Learning Alliance Logo
  • About Connected Learning
  • Who we are
  • Resources
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Get Connected
November 24, 2016

Toward a Pedagogy of Repair and Care

Author

Nishant Shah
Categories: Digital Citizenship, Equity
sign depicting rule no bad words allowed

Note: This is the introduction to a four-part mini-series that looks at a growing dissonance between the politics that we espouse in our classes and the realities that our students observe in their everyday practices. The impetus for this series emerges from the fact that while in class, the young scholars I work with struggle to engage with politics of care, life, and dignity. They experience in their digital zeitgeist an emerging culture of abrasive, brutal, and abusive language and behavior that negates their intellectual engagements. Beginning with setting up the context in this first post, I hope to look at three forms that pedagogy can take to repair this schism between the foundational values of being human and the powers that continue to erode humanity from our everyday practice.

Why should a professor of digital media, Indian in origin, living in the Netherlands, and teaching in Germany, care to dwell on the nature of political events in the U.S.A.? We have enough to worry about, in all the places I call home, and the students are indeed quite invested and interested in the series of developments that we see in the cities, countries, and regions that we live in. The most obvious answers to this question are about global connectivity and the privilege that the U.S.A. has in global politics. It is undeniable that my young undergraduate students consume U.S. politics, ideologies, values, and news almost incessantly. In their conversations, in their cultural references, in their expressions and linguistic appropriations, they mimic and emulate Americanisms that are sold to them through the massive cultural industry, largely consumed through the digital web. The U.S.A. obviously also has a strong influence on policy and partnerships of all of these countries, affecting and effecting, visible and insidious change that materially transform the way in which we live and learn.

And, yet, I want to forward another argument, which has more to do with pedagogic intention and practice rather than context and connectivity. This summer, I completed three years teaching in a German liberal arts university, where a majority of my students are first generation university learners, white, middle class, and grown up in a country that has seen prosperity and peace in their lifetime. They embody a politics of hope and a condition of privilege that they see as a naturalized state of being. A large portion of the students are marked by structural privilege which ensures their safety, access, affordability, care, and engagement within the higher education system. It is also a university where gender balance, at least within the student numbers, is well managed, if not particularly critiqued. Diversity, for most of our students, is a discursive commitment, but they do work within fairly homogenous groups, and I often get amused when they show me the diversity within their own country, challenging my presumption that Germans are the same everywhere, from across the nation.

When I first started teaching to this group, courses that look at intersections of gender, race, sexuality, and technology, drawing from post-colonial discourse, gender and sexuality theory, race politics, developmental critique, and digital cultures, one of the primary challenges that I had was to make sure that my students do not approach these questions of discrimination, deprivation, neglect and violence as others. Given the very different material circumstances that we embodied, and the different realities that I wanted to provoke them into, it was necessary to initiate a pedagogy where the problems of systemic racial prejudice, structural misogyny or sustained homophobia were not looked at as other people’s problems. Especially because in the German context, the official rhetoric often treats these as “resolved,” looking upon the critics as “killjoys’” who are unable to assimilate into and appreciate the system, it was important that our group realize these as persistently personal and political issues.

And, so, we arrived at the digital. It was a class that was ostentatiously offered in a cluster on digital cultures. So, it wasn’t a surprise that the digital became our entry point into these discussions. However, we were not going to think of the digital as an end unto itself. The digital was not just our site of study, it became a lens of study. We treated the digital not only as an extension but as a symptom of the macro realities that we inhabit. And, over the last four years now, every semester, young scholars have been using the digital landscape to identify processes of violence, abuse, and blind injustice, that has left them angry, confused, and frustrated. It has been inspiring for me, to watch groups of students encounter digital figures — from Kim Kardashian to Amanda Todd, from #GamerGate to Hunter Moore — and our effort has been to identify how these cultures of everyday violence naturalize a language of hatred, abuse, and unthinking discrimination in contemporary societies. It becomes a revelation to the group, when we realize that tropes of hatred in a troll war on twitter eventually find their way into how smaller groups on Snapchat deride and bully their peers. It comes as a shock that the rampant abuse on altwhite sites finds its ways on edit wars on Wikipedia. Students have noted how sexist comments from trolls on blogs becomes a way by which younger kids acclimatize to the social web, often mimicking this behavior in their interpersonal interactions. We have seen how the outtakes from reality TV shows influence the behavior and actions of young users who simulate these conditions in their everyday environment.

Through the years, we have learned that the digital is alarming in its capacity to make visible some of the darkest, most depraved, and downright scary practices of human social behavior. And, we have learned that these incidents cannot be studied as isolated phenomena or filtered actions. They have effects that linger long after the event, and often serve to develop a language that naturalizes and trivializes abuse as a matter-of-fact thing. Every semester, the young scholars I work with, exploring the conditions of domination and control using the digital as our habitus, show me how difficult it is to develop a language of respect, trust, empathy and care in the face of this continued outburst of a vocabulary that treats people as things. They struggle, collectively and individually, to try and form a language that allows us to have identities and expressions without the fear of suppression and intimidation, bullying and abuse.

In the last year or so, the U.S. presidential campaigns, have indeed become an object of scrutiny for the students, especially because so much of the social web has been paying it attention. Add to that the fact that the new president of the country has himself thought of the social web as his personal battleground, unleashing torrents of violence, hatred and abuse on individuals and collectives, often amplified by surrogates and supporters on different channels, and the young scholars I work with are often taken aback. On the one hand, they are confused because while the class pedagogy invokes for them the responsibility of using language carefully, and the need to develop a better vocabulary to offer respect and care to the societies they live in, they see a large mainstream media relishing in the joy of malicious expression. On the other hand, they are alarmed, because they see in the rhetoric and discourse in the online media around the elections, some very scary resonances. Often, the language and the trope that we have received is the same as the devices deployed by the neo-nazi parties in Germany, who are demanding the dehumanization of the refugees that Germany has been accommodating, and threatening to the immigrants who are “stealing” German jobs. For many of my students, this becomes more real because they recognize that the immigrants who are being targeted include people like me, who spend time in their classrooms and outside, as well as the refugees with whom the university works closely. They get dismayed that a global movement of white-lash and xenophobic, racist, misogynist discourse is on the rise. And, it frustrates them that even as they learn to develop a politics of equality and equity, this political discourse seems to lose meaning in the world that they are getting ready for.

This is why we come back to Donald Trump and the U.S. elections. Elections are the cornerstone of democratic nation-states and no matter how flawed the process and how dissatisfying the results, we have to have respect for the representational democracies we live in. What a country does with its leaders is, probably, its own prerogative, even though we know that the choices that one country makes affects the whole globalized connected world. Far be it for me or my students to offer anything more than our personal opinions and judgments about the election results. In very real terms, we do not see any immediate material transformations that this might lead to in our practice and life. And yet, the effect this election has had on young people, who are slowly finding their voice, to create a future that they want to live in, has been drastic and dire. Whether the new leaders of this free world will build a nation to its greatness or not, is to be seen. But, it will be undeniable, that for every educator in the classroom, in the U.S.A. or outside of it, committed to seeing our students engage with political values that inform our ideas of human equality, equity, and dignity, this election has been a challenge that will need many years of repair and intervention.

I begin this small series to reflect on the pedagogy that we will have to work on, collectively, and together, to make these repairs.

Banner image credit: WordShore

Related Posts

March 15, 2023 Mobilizing Teen-Centered Research Findings for Teen-Oriented Storytelling

March 13, 2023 The Power of Participatory Projects: Public Media and Gen Z

March 7, 2023 Call for Proposals Now Open for the Sixth Annual Connected Learning Summit

Categories

  • Civic Engagement
  • Connected Learning
  • Critical Perspectives
  • Digital Citizenship
  • Digital Learning
  • Edtech
  • Educational Practice
  • Equity
  • Featured
  • HX
  • New Trends
  • Research
  • Youth Well-Being

Blog Archive

  • 2023
    • February 2023
    • March 2023
  • 2022
    • January 2022
    • February 2022
    • April 2022
    • May 2022
    • June 2022
    • July 2022
    • August 2022
    • September 2022
    • October 2022
    • November 2022
    • December 2022
  • 2021
    • January 2021
    • February 2021
    • March 2021
    • April 2021
    • May 2021
    • June 2021
    • July 2021
    • August 2021
    • September 2021
    • October 2021
    • November 2021
    • December 2021
  • 2020
    • January 2020
    • February 2020
    • March 2020
    • April 2020
    • May 2020
    • June 2020
    • July 2020
    • August 2020
    • September 2020
    • October 2020
    • November 2020
    • December 2020
  • 2019
    • January 2019
    • February 2019
    • March 2019
    • April 2019
    • May 2019
    • June 2019
    • July 2019
    • August 2019
    • September 2019
    • October 2019
    • November 2019
    • December 2019
  • 2018
    • January 2018
    • February 2018
    • March 2018
    • April 2018
    • May 2018
    • June 2018
    • July 2018
    • August 2018
    • September 2018
    • October 2018
    • November 2018
    • December 2018
  • 2017
    • January 2017
    • February 2017
    • March 2017
    • April 2017
    • May 2017
    • June 2017
    • July 2017
    • August 2017
    • September 2017
    • October 2017
    • November 2017
    • December 2017
  • 2016
    • January 2016
    • February 2016
    • March 2016
    • April 2016
    • May 2016
    • June 2016
    • July 2016
    • August 2016
    • September 2016
    • October 2016
    • November 2016
    • December 2016
  • 2015
    • January 2015
    • February 2015
    • March 2015
    • April 2015
    • May 2015
    • June 2015
    • July 2015
    • August 2015
    • September 2015
    • October 2015
    • November 2015
    • December 2015
  • 2014
    • January 2014
    • February 2014
    • March 2014
    • April 2014
    • May 2014
    • June 2014
    • July 2014
    • August 2014
    • September 2014
    • October 2014
    • November 2014
    • December 2014
  • 2013
    • January 2013
    • February 2013
    • March 2013
    • April 2013
    • May 2013
    • June 2013
    • July 2013
    • August 2013
    • September 2013
    • October 2013
    • November 2013
    • December 2013
  • 2012
    • January 2012
    • February 2012
    • March 2012
    • April 2012
    • May 2012
    • June 2012
    • July 2012
    • August 2012
    • September 2012
    • October 2012
    • November 2012
    • December 2012
  • 2011
    • January 2011
    • February 2011
    • March 2011
    • April 2011
    • May 2011
    • June 2011
    • July 2011
    • August 2011
    • September 2011
    • October 2011
    • November 2011
    • December 2011
  • 2010
    • January 2010
    • February 2010
    • March 2010
    • April 2010
    • May 2010
    • June 2010
    • July 2010
    • August 2010
    • September 2010
    • October 2010
    • November 2010
    • December 2010
  • 2009
    • October 2009
    • November 2009
    • December 2009

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up-to-date with our latest news and information.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Connected Learning in Teaching Practice
  • Connected Learning Research Network
  • Connected Learning in Libraries
  • Connected Educators
  • Connected Courses
  • Connected Civics
  • Institute of Play

  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Work With Us
  • Media
  • Write for Us
  • People
  • Newsletter
  • CLRN
  • CL Summit
  • CL Lab